Independent Laboratory Analysis |
Click Here for 4pg Summary |
Click Here for 18pg Analysis |
In October 1997, tests were conducted by KM Laboratories in Grimstad, Norway on
samples taken from the municipal drinking water from the Grimstad waterworks. VIVATAP was added to the samples. Below are the results. |
| Analysis |
Zero Sample |
After 5 minutes |
After 1 hour |
After 4 hours |
After 24 hours |
| pH |
7.72 |
7.92 |
7.63 |
7.59 |
7.54 |
| Conductivity mS/m |
12.2 |
13.9 |
14.4 |
15.0 |
15.8 |
| Total chlorine mg |
0.30 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
| Total chlorine mg |
0.21 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
Tests were also conducted with regard to Escherichia coli
Table 7: The effect of Vivatap on E.Coli bacterium in
water from
Lake Rore and well water (parallel tests).
|
| |
After 10 minutes |
After 60 minutes |
| Water from Lake Rore without Vivatap |
47 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
| Water from Lake Rore with Vivatap |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Well water without Vivatap |
1880 |
1110 |
1170 |
1060 |
| Well water with Vivatap |
1300 |
600 |
80 |
0 |
|
The results indicate that the water quality improvement agent rerduces the amount
of culturable E. coli in water, and coincide with a previous study that also shows
that the water quality improvement agent (Vivatap), reduces the bacterial count (Aanonsen,
1999). This effect has two possible explanations: |
- Bacteria are absorbed to chitosan and/or other components in the bags containing
the water quality improvement agent (Vivatap), causing the bacterial count in the aqueous
phase to be reduced.
- One or more components in the bags containing the water
quality improvement agent (Vivatap) have an inactivating effect on bacteria, causing them
to lose their ability to grow on the agar plates. According to the literature, chitosan
may inhibit the growth of various types of microorganisims (Sudarshan and Associates
1992).
|